home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: erinews.ericsson.se!usenet
- From: ebcnklu@ebc.ericsson.se (Kristofer Lund)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: MUI 3.2
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 07:51:11 GMT
- Organization: Ericsson Business Networks AB
- Message-ID: <4f7162$l8u@erinews.ericsson.se>
- References: <3112e4a2@karkis.canit.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ebcp2025.ebc.ericsson.se
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/32.126
-
- bornhall@karkis.canit.se (Peter Bornhall) wrote:
-
- > Well, I for one would take BGUI over MUI any day. At least it's not as
- >bloated as MUI, and it doesn't require YET ANOTHER ASSIGN. What's with this
- >damn MUI assign? With 2.3 I had to MANUALLY edit the prefs, otherwise it just
- >asked for MUI: everytime it was started.
-
- Maybe you should have tried out the installer script..?
-
- >Hell, since when does a library (for
- >gods sake) require an entire drawer of its own?
-
- When it is as user configurable and exstensible as MUI..
-
- And.. correct me if I'm wrong, isn't it so that the minimum
- installation of MUI is just the libraries, which can be located in
- libs: as well as MUI:Libs... someone?
-
- >OTOH, I sincerely hope that they do NOT
- >use MUI or its descendents in a future Amiga OS.
-
- Offcourse we don't want MUI included with the OS, since it is an extra
- layer on top of the system. What we would like is the next AmigaOS GUI
- to look and work something like MUI.
-
- > And if you really want orange GUI's with green buttons, you apparently have
- >such lousy taste that you should convert to a PC with Windows 95. W95 is the
- >MUI (Microsoft User Interface) for the PC you know...
-
- The Win95 GUI is ages behind MUI, it is not resizeable, not
- font-sensitive not bla bla.. In short, it sucks equally as much as the
- Win3.1 GUI, just a different look.
-
- /\ _
- /\ \// Kristofer Lund gann@canit.se
- /_ \// -======================================================-
- /_\\//_\ MUI, boldly going where no GUI has gone before!
-
-
-